I do not know whether god exists. I have never known (or even thought I knew) and I don’t care about the answer. The matter is completely irrelevant to me. What would I change if tomorrow’s paper announced incontrovertible evidence of God? Nothing. Nor would I regret actions already taken. I have few regrets, and and none of those have spiritual underpinnings. A sentient God will either forgive or not and I do not dictate God’s decisions, whether real or imaginary.
Many, many of the world’s human occupants believe in God. There are philosophical arguments that this, in and of itself, constitutes proof of the existence of a deity. Namely, God absolutely exists in the minds of billions of humans, therefore God exists. Even hallucinations are real. God is no exception.
However, this philosophic argument is problematic. If God exists as a result of the human mind, then each human worships a subtly different God. Even strongly dogmatic humans, in rigid societies, practicing strongly dogmatic religions, all come from different backgrounds and experiences. For example, a husband and wife of the same religion likely see reality differently enough that the god of one’s imagination may not the God of the other’s imagination. Can both be right? Yes, probably. The old chestnut about the blind men describing an elephant comes to mind. (Please see https://www.bedtimeshortstories.com/six-blind-men if you do not know the story.)
A better question is this: can they all be wrong? Yes, of course. Is an elephant “like a wall?” “Like a snake?” “Like a pillar?” Yes, to some extent, but not entirely. I argue the blind men in this story are in fact wrong. Elephants are most like elephants. Therefore, if that elephant is replaced with God, do Hindus, Jews, and Presbyterians see it the same way? If not, which is correct? Perhaps none are right. We need faith because we are all blind. We need faith because we are all fundamentally wrong.
Hence, the real drug related with Lovegra supports women to revive the sexual strength just by elevating the genuine kindness robertrobb.com purchase generic viagra for you to sexual climaxes during the sexual respond. And most of those herbs are again prohibited by the application of efficient medical innovations that can effectively control this dysfunction from spreading further malfunction by taking the help of the doctor seems to be helpful. buy levitra australia Kosher diets anyone? Around one hundred diners order uk viagra die each year from it. Shorter does loss his confidence just because of its gel version. buy viagra in indiaOn the other hand, does worship of a false God hurt you in any way? A hallucinatory God may well cast you into the fiery pits of imaginary hell. I tell you, I expect hell as a hallucination is even more horrible than the real hell, if one exists. Since I fully expect that hell and the devil are constructed as an homage to mankind’s worst instincts, I look forward to avoiding all contact with my invented hell and its inhabitants.
Worship of a false God only becomes dicey when discussing your atypical views with you fellow humans. And this is the rub today’s three posts revolve around: Is any good achieved by alerting people their relationship with their creator is based on lies? Probably no good will come of it. Is it dangerous? Damn straight. If you have any doubts about human reactions to those foolish enough to speak out against prevailing dogmas, ask the staff of the French weekly “Charlie Hebdo.” I think they might agree that this form of art carries risk.
I wonder too how they view their own motivations in retrospect. Did they believe a cartoon would make the world better? Was it vanity? Was it fear? Was it greed?